Do government expendıtures and trade defıcıts affect each other ın the same way? Evıdence from Turkey

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

EKONOMSKI VJESNIK

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Özet

The purpose of this study is to determine the causality between trade deficits and government expenditure for the Turkish economy in different time horizons and in the case of different shock types between year 1987 and 2014. By doing so, we aim to understand whether the twin deficit hypothesis is valid in the Turkish economy or whether government expenditures have more ability to cause the movements of trade deficit. To do this, we employ asymmetric causality test developed by Hatemi-J (2012) and Hatemi-J and Roca (2014) and rolling windows causality test developed by Balcilaret al. (2010) methods. Results obtained from all tests imply that there is a bi-directional causality between variables. Different from other causality analysis, asymmetric causality analysis results indicate that an increase in government expenditures reduces trade deficit contrarily to existing literature. This means twin divergence hypothesis might be valid in the Turkish economy instead of twin deficit hypothesis.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

Asymmetric causality, Government expenditures, Trade deficit, Twin divergence hypothesis

Kaynak

EKONOMSKI VJESNIK

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

30

Sayı

1

Künye

Bayat T., Kayhan S., Acci Y. (2017). Do government expendıtures and trade defıcıts affect each other ın the same way? Evıdence from Turkey. Ekonomski Vjesnik, 30(1), 169-180.

Onay

İnceleme

Ekleyen

Referans Veren