Surgical Indication in Thyroid Nodules ?4 cm: Do Larger Nodules Carry Higher Malignancy and Complication Risks?

dc.contributor.authorAslan, Firat
dc.contributor.authorBinici, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorBeger, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorEryilmaz, Iklil
dc.contributor.authorTahiroglu, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorYesilyurt, Degercan
dc.contributor.authorTeke, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-22T19:51:58Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentŞırnak Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective:The management of thyroid nodules is outlined in various clinical guidelines. While the American Thyroid Association guideline provides more systematic algorithms for thyroid nodules smaller than 4 cm in diameter, there is no consensus on the management of nodules >= 4 cm. This study aims to contribute to this topic by evaluating the clinical data of patients who underwent thyroidectomy for nodules measuring >= 4 cm.Methods:This study included 199 patients who underwent thyroidectomy due to thyroid nodules measuring >= 4 cm in diameter. Patients were evaluated based on age, sex, preoperative, postoperative day 1, and at least 1-month postoperative calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, maximum nodule diameter, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) status, and final pathology data.Results:A total of 199 patients (28 men, 171 women; mean age: 46.52 +/- 13.82 y) were included in the study. Malignancy was identified in 17.6% of the cases. Nodule size was significantly larger in male patients (P=0.017) and in malignant lesions, particularly those >= 4 cm. FNAB was performed in 39.2% of the patients; there was no statistically significant association between FNAB performance and age group, sex, or pathology results. However, false-negative FNAB results were detected in 25% of malignant cases, indicating the limited sensitivity of FNAB, especially in nodules >= 4 cm.Conclusion:Thyroid nodules measuring >= 4 cm may warrant surgical intervention regardless of whether FNAB was performed or reported as benign, due to their relatively higher rates of malignancy and associated complications.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000012045
dc.identifier.endpagee95
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue1/2
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6938-2076
dc.identifier.pmid41066650
dc.identifier.startpagee91
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012045
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11503/3572
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001649586500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20260122
dc.subjectFine-needle aspiration biopsy
dc.subjectthyroid nodule
dc.subjectthyroid surgery
dc.titleSurgical Indication in Thyroid Nodules ?4 cm: Do Larger Nodules Carry Higher Malignancy and Complication Risks?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar